Kraken, the US’s second-largest crypto exchange, has reportedly secured access to the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) core payment systems, marking a significant milestone as the first crypto firm to operate on the same infrastructure utilized by thousands of banks and credit unions.
Kraken Scores Major Victory For The Crypto IndustryAccording to the Wednesday report, the Kraken unit, which holds a special Wyoming state bank charter specifically designed for crypto companies, is not receiving the full range of services available to banks, such as interest payments on reserves held at the central bank.
The Fed master account approval will allow Kraken Financial to “handle transactions more quickly and seamlessly for big clients and professional traders,” the company told the WSJ. Moreover, it will grant Kraken’s banking unit direct access to Fedwire, a major interbank payment system that processes over $4 trillion in transfers a day.
Arjun Sethi, co-chief executive of Kraken, told the WSJ that the direct access to the Fed’s payment rails “improves reliability and efficiency for moving fiat deposits in and out of digital-asset markets.”
Kraken Financial’s master account has been approved for an initial term of one year, the news media outlet reported.
Banks Push Back On Crypto Firm’s Access To Fed’s RailsThe proposal would allow payment fintechs and crypto companies to access the Fed’s payment rails, but excludes other benefits that are more aligned with banks, including its discount window lending facility.
In a joint letter, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), The Clearing House Association (TCHPA), and Financial Services Forum (FSF) demanded a 12-month waiting period before firms can apply for payment accounts. The banking groups argued the Fed “should block access until newly licensed stablecoin issuers prove they can operate safely.”
In December, the OCC approved conditional bank charters for Ripple, Circle, BitGo, Paxos, and Fidelity. The approval raised concerns that it could blur the lines between banking activities and lead to regulatory arbitrage.
The banking lobby raised concerns about the uncertainty surrounding emerging business models, the need for increased transparency in the charter application and decision-making processes, and the absence of finalized federal oversight.
Ultimately, the ABA proposed delaying the review process until Congress completes the rules that will ultimately govern many recent applicants for the OCC’s charter.
