The governance page says the burn would happen as soon as the vote clears, and holders who do not accept the new terms would stay locked. Early supporters would keep their full allocation under the revised schedule, but their tokens would not start unlocking until year 2 after passage.
Every advisor, institution, partner, founder, and team member locked token — all 45,238,585,647 WLFI — is assigned to a 2-year cliff with a 3-year linear vest upon opting in, and subject to a 10% burn upon doing so.
Up to 4,523,858,565 WLFI permanently destroyed.
This is the…
WLFI frames the proposal as a way to replace open-ended uncertainty with a fixed timeline for release. The plan also draws a line between user groups. Early supporters would get a four-year distribution path with no burn attached. Founders, team members, advisers and partners would face a stricter setup, with the burn applied only to their allocation and the rest released over a longer period.
The proposal says that structure is meant to create a clearer picture of future supply and governance.
I have always been an ardent supporter of President Trump and his crypto friendly policy.
As an early supporter who invested heavily in World Liberty Financial, I did so because I believed in the vision that was presented to the public: a decentralized finance platform that…
Governance Under StrainThe governance page also shows that WLFI has already passed six proposals, with participation ranging from 2.7 billion to 11.1 billion WLFI, and says active voting has reached only about 23% of the locked supply affected by this plan.
That detail matters because the new vote is not just about supply. It is also about control, timing and who gets to decide when the token starts moving.
The proposal says the current setup leaves too much uncertainty around locked tokens, and argues that the network has grown enough to support a clearer schedule.
Featured image from Meta, chart from TradingView
