Sam Altman would like you to know that your childhood was expensive. Terribly expensive. And frankly, it’s unclear whether humans are worth all the time and resources.
Last week, at the AI Impact Summit in India, OpenAI's CEO offered a staggering take in the AI energy debate—by pointing out that humans, not AI, are basically the problem.
Asked about ChatGPT's environmental footprint, Altman didn't apologize or hedge. Instead, he compared the immense amount of energy needed to raise humans to the energy demands of an AI data center—and suggested the data centers are getting more efficient.
"It also takes a lot of energy to train a human," he told The Indian Express. "It takes like 20 years of life and all of the food you eat during that time before you get smart. And not only that, it took the very widespread evolution of the hundred billion people that have ever lived and learned not to get eaten by predators... to produce you."
His conclusion: "Probably AI has already caught up on an energy-efficiency basis, measured that way."
I do not want to see a world where we equate a piece of technology to a human being.
That's one way to say it.
And yet, Altman and OpenAI want to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI), and when someone asks him about the electricity bill, his move is: Have you considered how much energy it took to raise you?
Altman did say one thing that might yield broad agreement: that the world "needs to move towards nuclear, wind, and solar very quickly."
Note that Altman chairs Oklo, a nuclear startup. Whether that makes the recommendation more credible or self-serving may depend on how much trust you have left in Altman after he compared your childhood to a training run.
